Nuclear Power for Australia?
Australia has one of the worlds largest uranium reserves. It is therefore ironic that Australia did not take advantage of this resource to produce energy. Australia has only one nuclear reactor and is mainly used in science / research not energy production. This is because Australia also access huge cost coal reserves. Australia has so many coal for energy production, the majority of the energy from this source. Being a dry continent is experiencing a record drought options for hydropower is limited and already widely used.
The problem to be so dependent on coal is the amount of CO2 and other gases that contribute to global warming. Australia continues to have an economic and population growth has increased demand of energy as most of the world. Australia, which has not signed the Kyoto agreement (rightly Kyoto is a simple measure of the band aid and will not seriously change our environmental problems).
Thus, the Australian Prime Minister, John Howard, pushing the Australians to consider the nuclear option to meet future energy needs, such as nuclear power plants do not emit greenhouse gases CO2 or another. However, there are a number of problems with this option.
First nuclear power is more expensive power. Australians are already complaining about the size of their electricity bills (an average Brisbane family spends about $ 500 - $ 800 a quarter or more than $ 2,000 per year). This is particularly hard those who rely on air conditioning to counter the warm climate of Australia. They are not willing to accept the more expensive options.
Second, although there are thousands of nuclear power plants without incident, although it happened on the other side of the world Australians are well aware of the Chernobyl disaster and the terrible consequences that continue to be feel. Australia although a large continent is essentially like a giant island with a greenbelt that extends several hundred kilometers from the coast of the sea, the rest being in a vast desert or desert state near most of the time. Australia could not afford to have a section of the "green" band destroyed or no-go area, such a result would have a greater impact disaster in other "normal" country. It has been clearly established for nuclear energy as an option to be near a water source nearby power users to reduce transmission costs.
The vast majority of Australians would have to "not in my backyard." While most would not care if a plant in the desert a few thousand miles away, the lack of water costs and transmission to make this option unrealistic. With a plant in their backyard there is a higher radiation transport of nuclear waste to a detention center (probably somewhere in the outback) risk. Although Australia could easily have installed nucealr waste safe for people due to extreme isolation and geological stablity in the outback, the problem lies in the transport of the substance there. Road and rail are both subject to regular accidents. A heavy vehicle transporting waste could cause a mini-Chernobyl's nuclear waste into the environment of such an accident can endanger a large area and with long-term consequences.
These wastes of nuclear power plants also give Australia the opportunity to immediately nuclear weapons in a very short time. Australia is already recognized to have the technological know-how required to produce the missile and warhead technology. Such a result would be very worrying for our neighbors and reduce our argument against countries such as North Korea to have nuclear weapons.
Similarly, these nuclear plants would be a magnet for terrorists and others.
The final nail in the coffin of the premiers idea is that states clearly that they have no interest in nuclear energy. Such a battle on energy would be on the very survival of states and their rights. If States have lost a battle to the point of parliments each state would dumb, they would overlooks unnecessary federation with the federal government, in fact, support any government in Australia should such happen eventually. Some say this process of destruction of the state government is already well advanced, with the federal government always grabbing more power, but beyond that is another article.
While nuclear energy has a mink Greenhouse Gase free energy production, it does not present a realistic future for Australia. Australia has other options to explore, wind and solar energy, geothermal and perhaps the real future for a cleaner world - H2 - Hydrogen Power. Maybe put research and money in this field, the results will be better and more politically acceptable.
You are invited to submit articles to Ezine @ rticles skilful and other major article directories like [http://www.article-gems.com]
This article is the property of Alastair Harris and his immediate family. It may be republished free on the internet but must include original links.
Alastair Harris is the main promoter of the article-gems. Com article directory (visit [http://www.article-gems.com]) and getfinancialfreedom4u websites, blogs and family projects (visit http://getfinancialfreedom4u.ws) specializing in online business opportunities and education, income generated by the affiliate, google, GDI, eBay, clip flipping and more marketing. Alastair is considered an expert author of numerous article directories and is very open to assisting others on the internet .....
Australia has one of the worlds largest uranium reserves. It is therefore ironic that Australia did not take advantage of this resource to produce energy. Australia has only one nuclear reactor and is mainly used in science / research not energy production. This is because Australia also access huge cost coal reserves. Australia has so many coal for energy production, the majority of the energy from this source. Being a dry continent is experiencing a record drought options for hydropower is limited and already widely used.
The problem to be so dependent on coal is the amount of CO2 and other gases that contribute to global warming. Australia continues to have an economic and population growth has increased demand of energy as most of the world. Australia, which has not signed the Kyoto agreement (rightly Kyoto is a simple measure of the band aid and will not seriously change our environmental problems).
Thus, the Australian Prime Minister, John Howard, pushing the Australians to consider the nuclear option to meet future energy needs, such as nuclear power plants do not emit greenhouse gases CO2 or another. However, there are a number of problems with this option.
First nuclear power is more expensive power. Australians are already complaining about the size of their electricity bills (an average Brisbane family spends about $ 500 - $ 800 a quarter or more than $ 2,000 per year). This is particularly hard those who rely on air conditioning to counter the warm climate of Australia. They are not willing to accept the more expensive options.
Second, although there are thousands of nuclear power plants without incident, although it happened on the other side of the world Australians are well aware of the Chernobyl disaster and the terrible consequences that continue to be feel. Australia although a large continent is essentially like a giant island with a greenbelt that extends several hundred kilometers from the coast of the sea, the rest being in a vast desert or desert state near most of the time. Australia could not afford to have a section of the "green" band destroyed or no-go area, such a result would have a greater impact disaster in other "normal" country. It has been clearly established for nuclear energy as an option to be near a water source nearby power users to reduce transmission costs.
The vast majority of Australians would have to "not in my backyard." While most would not care if a plant in the desert a few thousand miles away, the lack of water costs and transmission to make this option unrealistic. With a plant in their backyard there is a higher radiation transport of nuclear waste to a detention center (probably somewhere in the outback) risk. Although Australia could easily have installed nucealr waste safe for people due to extreme isolation and geological stablity in the outback, the problem lies in the transport of the substance there. Road and rail are both subject to regular accidents. A heavy vehicle transporting waste could cause a mini-Chernobyl's nuclear waste into the environment of such an accident can endanger a large area and with long-term consequences.
These wastes of nuclear power plants also give Australia the opportunity to immediately nuclear weapons in a very short time. Australia is already recognized to have the technological know-how required to produce the missile and warhead technology. Such a result would be very worrying for our neighbors and reduce our argument against countries such as North Korea to have nuclear weapons.
Similarly, these nuclear plants would be a magnet for terrorists and others.
The final nail in the coffin of the premiers idea is that states clearly that they have no interest in nuclear energy. Such a battle on energy would be on the very survival of states and their rights. If States have lost a battle to the point of parliments each state would dumb, they would overlooks unnecessary federation with the federal government, in fact, support any government in Australia should such happen eventually. Some say this process of destruction of the state government is already well advanced, with the federal government always grabbing more power, but beyond that is another article.
While nuclear energy has a mink Greenhouse Gase free energy production, it does not present a realistic future for Australia. Australia has other options to explore, wind and solar energy, geothermal and perhaps the real future for a cleaner world - H2 - Hydrogen Power. Maybe put research and money in this field, the results will be better and more politically acceptable.
You are invited to submit articles to Ezine @ rticles skilful and other major article directories like [http://www.article-gems.com]
This article is the property of Alastair Harris and his immediate family. It may be republished free on the internet but must include original links.
Alastair Harris is the main promoter of the article-gems. Com article directory (visit [http://www.article-gems.com]) and getfinancialfreedom4u websites, blogs and family projects (visit http://getfinancialfreedom4u.ws) specializing in online business opportunities and education, income generated by the affiliate, google, GDI, eBay, clip flipping and more marketing. Alastair is considered an expert author of numerous article directories and is very open to assisting others on the internet .....
No comments:
Post a Comment